Then
there are
TPC properties like Jasna Polana, a secluded, baronial private
community occupying the former J. Seward Johnson estate in
Princeton, N.J., and a one-hit wonder as a tournament
site (a Champions Tour event in 2000). A visitor might wonder how a
golf
community could be more alluring, but at the same time
one could
ask: Why is
this a TPC club?
Architect
selection has been a bone of contention with many players,
including
the unnamed
source who says, “I’m sorry, but it’s
time to hire someone
besides Jack
[Nicklaus], Arnold [Palmer]
or Pete Dye.” Nearly every TPC
project has a
“player-consultant” in the design credit, but those names
are
often selected for
marketing purposes or simply because the
consultant hails from the region where
the course is being
built.
According to full-time architects who work on TPC
projects, rarely is
an interest in course design a
prerequisite for a consulting
gig.
Architects
also
find their hands tied by bizarre design guidelines derived from player
surveys. The resulting template of standardized green, tee and
fairway
sizes
leads to a sameness that limits an architect’s
hand. Tom
Weiskopf, who
co-designed the TPC of Scottsdale with
former partner Jay
Morrish, was
sufficiently irked by these
guidelines to publicly declare
he would never do
another
course with the tour (although he has since
designed the TPC at Craig
Ranch in McKinney, Texas).
It’s
TPCs like
Weiskopf’s at Scottsdale (home to the FBR Open), along with the TPCs
at
Sawgrass and Connecticut’s River Highlands (Buick
Championship), that
continue to be praised for melding the
needs of the field, the
galleries,
television and the bottom
line. These more successful TPCs
also prove fun to
play for
the average golfer and exciting for fans
watching at home. Not
surprisingly, their popularity begins with
architectural
integrity.
“They
create
that arena atmosphere,” says Weed, who did the tour’s redesign work at
River Highlands and Sawgrass, and also co-designed three other
TPCs.
“All you
have to do is attend one of those three events
and you’ll know
that’s about as
exciting as it gets on the PGA
Tour.”
Weed
points to a
common denominator that he says sets Sawgrass, Scottsdale and River
Highlands apart: an absence of real estate development within
their
routings.
“They’re all core courses. You have instant
integrity on a
core golf course that
you don’t ever get once
you start stretching it
with road crossings or
out-of-bounds
on both sides of the hole.”
Within
that
core, the architectural details also elicit heroic play. “Scottsdale is
cool because down the stretch they’ve got a reachable par-5, a
driveable par-4
and a shorter par-3,” says architect and
former tour
player John Fought. “All
those elements are
exciting. Just as on the
back nine at Augusta National, it’s
exciting not simply because they’re
all bruising holes, but
because they require
so much
thought.”
River
Highlands
sports a watery, drama-filled finish highlighted by its driveable
par-4
15th. Sawgrass’ short par-5 16th has probably impacted
tournament outcomes
as much as Dye’s famed island-green 17th. Combine
well-balanced
risk-reward
elements with the massive crowds who
envelope the action on
these holes and the
atmosphere becomes
electric.
ABC
golf
producer Mark Loomis says the ideal TPC offers “finishing holes
conducive
to large galleries … [and sets up] the possibility of
significant
changes in the
leaderboard.” He cites Sawgrass and
River Highlands as
perfect examples because
“eagles are
possible, as are bogeys and
double-bogeys.”
Loomis
loves
River Highlands’ short 15th because “it’s a par-3.5 but driving it in
the
water is possible and it’s a hard up-and-in from the right if you
bail
out.” As
for that infamous 17th at Sawgrass, Loomis says
“it’s exciting
to see the best
players in the world sweat over
a 9-iron. These holes
give the viewer the
feeling that no lead
is safe.”
Looking
to the
future of TPCs, contemporary architects favor a return to classical
design elements, which they say would enhance the experience
for
weekend golfers
and tournament players alike. This means
strategy,
unpredictability, intimacy,
sandy-soil sites and
more holes that fall
into par’s gray
area.
“I
think you can
still build ‘half-par’ holes that elicit creative options,” Weed
says.
“Too many courses today are played specifically from the
physical
standpoint. Mental agility doesn’t come into
play.”
Architect
Brian
Silva would like to see more holes that require players to “put the
ball
down on the ground during an approach shot. I’m just so entirely
exhausted
watching these players play darts, and darts with no
thought
or
invention.”