There is no doubt green speeds on the PGA Tour have gone up—in 1976 the
average green measured 71⁄2 feet—but there is also misperception: People often
think greens at tournament courses are faster than they are. Tour greens roll
between 10 and 121⁄2 feet, depending on the architecture and event. At pro-ams,
for example, officials hold back speeds for the amateurs in the field.
Similarly, the USGA adjusts speed according to architecture, as indicated by
a tale of two A.W. Tillinghast designs. At the 2002 U.S. Open, the relatively
flat greens at Bethpage State Park’s Black course allowed Moraghan and his staff
to shave the grass as closely as possible. By Sunday afternoon, unofficial
Stimpmeter readings were approaching 15.
In 2006 Winged Foot West’s greens, which feature tiers, mounds and slopes,
ran about 12 feet. And for the 2006 Curtis Cup at Pacific Dunes, the greens were
at 91⁄2 feet so the bold contours could come into play without the greens
turning into an amusement park ride.
Elevating green speeds, especially at older courses, often disregards the
architecture of the individual layout. Because the existing agronomy did not
allow grass to be cut so short, most courses built during the Golden Age—Winged
Foot, Prairie Dunes, Pinehurst—feature a lot of movement on the putting
surfaces. Today, there are two ways to deal with the marriage of extreme speeds
and severe slopes: Rein in the speed or soften the
undulations.
Many architects espouse the first option. “When you
start changing green contours to accommodate green speeds, that’s putting the
cart before the horse,” says Bill Coore, Ben Crenshaw’s design partner.
When performing restoration work, Gil Hanse avoids softening greens unless
they are overly severe. “I think it is more important to retain the
architectural integrity of these historic courses than to achieve some number on
the Stimpmeter,” Hanse says. “After we touch that green it is gone
forever, and I think it is important that we are able to see the work that Ross,
MacKenzie and others left behind in as pure a state as possible.”
Tom Marzolf, senior design associate for Tom Fazio’s firm, disagrees. He has
reworked greens at a number of fabled layouts, including the last two Open
sites, Oakmont and Winged Foot. At both, he recaptured lost areas with “green
extensions,” softening the slopes in corners of green sections.
Marzolf argues that Golden Age architects designed slopes that were in line
with the maintenance practices of the time. He surmises that if those designers
were alive, they too would be altering their putting surfaces to reclaim hole
locations lost to speed.
“I think there is a lot of romance that goes into preserving the past,” he
says. “I think it’s just a bunch of nonsense.”
The problem isn’t just on
older courses. When talking to owners and developers, Tom Doak discusses green
speeds in relation to the style of putting surfaces he would build. But on
several occasions, he has returned to find that the clubs had bowed to pressure
and the greens were too fast for the contouring.
“Some feel drawn in by
neighbors and members,” Doak says. “The desire for fast greens has led many
contemporary architects to build boring greens because that’s the only style
that can handle the quicker pace.”